U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Floyd v. Baskerville

Floyd v. Baskerville
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 7, 2001 · Luttig, Motz, Hamilton
8 F. App'x 256

Floyd v. Baskerville

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Elmer Floyd appeals the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Floyd v. Baskerville, No. CA-00-437-3 (E.D.Va. Jan. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

*

This case was decided by a magistrate judge upon consent of the parties under 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(c)(1) (West 1993 & Supp. 2000).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.