Walker v. Lockheed Martin Corp
Walker v. Lockheed Martin Corp
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-2409
AUGUST WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-1263)
Submitted: April 30, 2001 Decided: May 15, 2001
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John M. Clifford, Peter F. Butcher, CLIFFORD, LYONS & GARDE, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. R. Mark Dare, Jennifer J. Dacey, REED, SMITH, HAZEL & THOMAS, L.L.P., Falls Church, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: August Walker appeals the district court’s order granting Lockheed Martin Corporation’s motion for summary judgment in this employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We note in particular that Walker legally suffered no adverse employment action. See Boone v. Goldin, 178 F.3d 253, 255-56 (4th Cir. 1999); Page v. Bolger, 645 F.2d 227, 233 (4th Cir. 1981) (en banc).
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Walker v. Lockheed Martin Corp., No. CA-00-1263 (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.