United States v. Clark
United States v. Clark
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6255
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus
TYRONE CLARK, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-310-JFM)
Submitted: May 17, 2001 Decided: May 25, 2001
Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tyrone Clark, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Tyrone Clark appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reduction of his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c) (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Clark, No. CR-91-310-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 17, 2001). To the extent that Clark presents new issues on appeal, we note that such claims are not properly presented in a motion for reduction of sentence under § 3582 and are not properly raised for the first time on appeal. See 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c); United States v. Maxton, 940 F.2d 103, 105 (4th Cir. 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.