U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Wassil v. Schneider

Wassil v. Schneider
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 8, 2001

Wassil v. Schneider

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1325

JOSEPH D. WASSIL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JAMES F. SCHNEIDER, Judge, individually and in his official capacity; ELLEN M. HELLER, Judge, individually and in her official capacity; B.

GEORGE BALLMAN, Trustee; JOEL P. GOLDBERGER, Trustee; GLORIA ALLENDER, Commissioner; JIMMIE L. FOXWORTH, Commissioner; FRANK M. CONAWAY, Clerk; JAMES PIPER, Realtor; P. WESLEY FOSTER, JR., Realtor; WESLEY P. HAIRSTON, Realtor; BOB THOMAS, Defendant Piper’s Agent; NICHOLAS J.

DELPIZZO, III, Attorney, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-01- 338-L)

Submitted: May 31, 2001 Decided: June 8, 2001

Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph D. Wassil, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Joseph D. Wassil appeals from the district court’s order deny- ing his petition for a writ of mandamus. Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Wassil v. Schneider, No. CA-01-338-L (D. Md. Feb. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.