Melvin Sumler appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial based upon newly discovered evidence. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Sumler, No. CR-96-116 (E.D.Va. Sept. 26, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented *321 in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.