U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

United States v. Lee

United States v. Lee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 6, 2001 · Wilkins, Traxler, King
10 F. App'x 235

United States v. Lee

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone Lee appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his Bivens * complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Lee, No. CA-00-209-3 (E.D.Va. Nov. 27, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

See Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of the Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.