UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1306

ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 01-1307

ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WILLIAM L. OSTEEN, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 01-1310

ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

WILLIAM L. OSTEEN; HERBERT J. HUTTON, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge. (MISC-01-10-1, MISC-01-12-1, MISC-01-11-1)

Submitted: May 24, 2001 Decided: June 6, 2001

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Arthur O. Armstrong appeals a district court order denying his motions for leave to file com- plaints. We have reviewed the record and the district court order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Armstrong’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and for summary judgment and dismiss the appeals as frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate- ly presented in the material before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED