Morris Barbour appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find that this appeal fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reason *73 ing of the district court. See Barbour v. Ray, No. CA-01-79-5-BR (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.