Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mt
Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mt
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 00-1842
DEAN RUSSELL CARRICO, Plaintiff - Appellant, and
DRC SERVICES, INCORPORATED, a corporation; BEARS REAL ESTATE AND RENTALS, INCORPORATED; BEARS, INCORPORATED, Plaintiffs, versus
VILLAGE OF SUGAR MOUNTAIN; JACK ANDERSON, in- dividually and as councilman for the Village of Sugar Mountain; CARLENE HALL, individually and as Town Manager and Zoning Administrator for the Village of Sugar Mountain, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (CA-99-168-1)
Submitted: November 30, 2000 Decided: June 18, 2001
Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dean Russell Carrico, Appellant Pro Se. William Alfred Blancato, MCCALL, DOUGHTON & BLANCATO, P.L.L.C., Winston-Salem, North Caro- lina; Stephen Mason Thomas, PATRICK, HARPER & DIXON, Hickory, North Carolina; Frank J. Contrivo, FRANK J. CONTRIVO, P.A., Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Dean Russell Carrico appeals the district court’s order adopt- ing the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and dis- missing this civil action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. According- ly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Carrico v. Village of Sugar Mountain, No. CA-99-168-1 (W.D.N.C. May 22, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.