Michael Errol Wilson appeals the denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion seeking to alter or amend the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Wilson, Nos. CR-97-39-BO; CA-00-55-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec. 20, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court *108 and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.