United States v. Faircloth
United States v. Faircloth
13 F. App'x 99
United States v. Faircloth
Opinion
John Wesley Faircloth appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a new trial. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Faircloth, No. CR-95-72 (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 16, 2000; entered Nov. 17, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.