U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

United States v. Campfield

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 5, 2001 · Widener, Gregory, Hamilton

13 F. App'x 151

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kevin Campfield seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal substantially on the reasoning of the district court. * United States v. Campfield, Nos. CR-98-315; CA-01-622-CCB (D.Md. Mar. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Campfield’s claim that his sentence is not proper in light of the rule announced in Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), is without merit. We recently held in United States v. Sanders, 247 F.3d 139 (4th Cir. 2001), that the new rule announced in Apprendi is not retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.