Kelvin J. Hurdle seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment against him on his Title VII claims. See 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record, the district court’s opinion, and the materials submitted by the parties and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hurdle v. Virginia, No. CA-00-836 (E.D.Va. Jan. 5, 2001). We deny Hurdle’s motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.