U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

United States v. De Los Santos-Mora

United States v. De Los Santos-Mora
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 2, 2001

United States v. De Los Santos-Mora

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6470

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

RICARDO ANTONIO DE LOS SANTOS-MORA, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CR-96-49)

Submitted: July 26, 2001 Decided: August 2, 2001

Before WILKINS, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ricardo Antonio De Los Santos-Mora, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Bradenham, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Ricardo Antonio De Los Santos-Mora seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A.

§ 2255 (West Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the dis- trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny De Los Santos-Mora’s motions for a certificate of appeal- ability and to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. De Los Santos-Mora, No. CR-96-49 (E.D. Va. Feb. 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.