Camell Hunnieutt appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint for failure to comply with the conditional filing order. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hun-nicutt v. Virginia Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-01-254-7 (W.D.Va. Apr. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.