Smith v. Angelone
Smith v. Angelone
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6461
RYLAND SMITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
RONALD J. ANGELONE; GENE JOHNSON; R. A. YOUNG; GEORGE DEEDS; R. C. MATHENA; MAJOR ROWLETTE; LIEUTENANT YOUNCE; LIEUTENANT HONAKER; SER- GEANT BLEVINS; SERGEANT CHILDRESS; OFFICER KILBORNE; DOCTOR BUNKER; NURSE MULLINS; NURSE BRADLEY; JOHN DOES, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-616-7)
Submitted: July 31, 2001 Decided: August 21, 2001
Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ryland Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Garrett Hill, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; David Ernest Boelzner, WRIGHT, ROBINSON, OSTHIMER & TATUM, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Ryland Smith appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Angelone, No. CA-99-616-7 (W.D. Va. Nov. 16, 2000 & filed Feb. 28, 2001; entered Mar. 1, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.