William Melvin Bain appeals the district court’s judgment and commitment order revoking supervised release and sentencing him to 24 months’ imprisonment. We *181 find that the district court had jurisdiction to conduct the hearing. We further find that Bain’s right to a reasonably prompt revocation hearing was not violated. See United States v. Scott, 850 F.2d 316, 319-20 (7th Cir. 1988). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.