U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Claybrooks v. Newsome

Claybrooks v. Newsome
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 18, 2001

Claybrooks v. Newsome

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-7097

SALLY E. CLAYBROOKS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

JIM NEWSOME, Safety Inspector; MARY CLARKE, Doctor VCCW; BOBBI HENDERSON, Nurse, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-00-1097-AM)

Submitted: September 10, 2001 Decided: September 18, 2001

Before WIDENER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sally E. Claybrooks, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Sally E. Claybrooks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Claybrooks v. Newsome, No. CA-00-1097-AM (E.D.

Va. July 21, 2000); see Booth v. Churner, 531 U.S. 956 (2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.