Jack Traynum Howard seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Howard, Nos. CR-94-444-JFM; CA-00-3088-JFM (D.Md. Mar. 21, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal *137 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.