Herring v. Richardson
Herring v. Richardson
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6966
WILLIAM MORGAN HERRING, IV,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
SERGEANT RICHARDSON,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-00-145-5-H)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 27, 2001
Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Morgan Herring, IV, Appellant Pro Se. James Peeler Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
William Morgan Herring, IV appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 2000)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. See Herring v. Richardson,
No. CA-00-145-5-H (E.D.N.C. May 1, 2001). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished