U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Ward v. Widnall

Ward v. Widnall
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 26, 2001 · Luttig, King, Gregory
19 F. App'x 121

Ward v. Widnall

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael R. Ward appeals from the magistrate judge’s * order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Ward v. Peters, No. CA-98-1273-DKC (D.Md. May 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.