U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Seabrook v. Robinson

Seabrook v. Robinson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 26, 2001

Seabrook v. Robinson

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6650

ONAJE KUDURA SEABROOK, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

LIEUTENANT ROBINSON, Supervisor of Cypress Unit at Kershaw Correctional Institution; DAVID A. KING, Officer at Kershaw Correctional Institution; RICKIE HARRISON, Warden of Kershaw Correctional Institution; DEBBIE WISE, Grievance Coordinator at Kershaw Correctional Institution; DIRECTOR, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPART- MENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-99-3133-2-13AJ)

Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: September 26, 2001

Before LUTTIG, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Onaje Kudura Seabrook, Appellant Pro Se. Terry B. Millar, TERRY B.

MILLAR, L.L.C., Rock Hill, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Onaje Kudura Seabrook appeals the district court’s order deny- ing relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint.

We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no revers- ible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the dis- trict court. Seabrook v. Robinson, No. CA-99-3133-2-13AJ (D.S.C. Mar. 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.