Odinkemelu v. Williams
Opinion
Christopher J. Odinkemelu appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Odinkemelu v. Williams, No. CA-00-750-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 2001). Defendants’ motion for sanctions is granted, and Defendants are awarded reasonable costs and attorneys’ fees. In addition, we enjoin Odinkemelu from filing any further civil actions in this court until such time as these monetary sanctions are paid, and unless a district court judge certifies that his claim is not frivolous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Christopher J. ODINKEMELU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jorja WILLIAMS; Myrtle Foust; Veronica McLean; Karen Jones; Alicia Oakley Resendiz, Defendants-Appellees
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished