Howlett v. School Board of the City of Norfolk
Opinion
Franklin D. Howlett appeals the magistrate judge’s order granting summary judgment to his former employer and order denying a motion to reconsider under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinions *136 and find no reversible error. * Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Howlett v. School Board of the City of Norfolk, No. CA-00-168-2 (E.D.Va. Sept. 15, 2000) (for reasons as stated from the bench); Howlett v. School Board of the City of Norfolk, No. CA-00-168-2 (E.D. Va. filed Apr. 9, 2001; entered Apr. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 73.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Franklin D. HOWLETT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SCHOOL BOARD OF THE CITY OF NORFOLK, Defendant-Appellee
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished