J.O. Lively Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Opinion
J.O. Lively Construction Company (“employer”) seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s denial of the employer’s petition for modification of the Board’s order finding employer to be the responsible operator for black lung benefits owed to Edeker Harless. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See J.O. Lively Const. Co. v. Director, OWCP, BRB Nos. 00-417-BLA; 97-1481-BLA (B.R.B. Mar. 23, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- J.O. LIVELY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Petitioner, and Hazel Harless, Widow of Edeker Harless, Claimant, v. DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent
- Status
- Unpublished