U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

United States v. Woodfolk

United States v. Woodfolk
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 2, 2001

United States v. Woodfolk

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6560

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

COREY LORENZO WOODFOLK, Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-6621

COREY LORENZO WOODFOLK, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-419-JFM, CA-01-727-JFM)

Submitted: August 24, 2001 Decided: October 2, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Corey Lorenzo Woodfolk appeals the district court’s orders de- nying his motion to vacate judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)(4) and denying his petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Woodfolk, No. CR-93-419-JFM (D. Md. Mar.

22, 2001); Woodfolk v. United States, No. CA-01-727-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 2, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.