Lauren Anthony Watson, Jr., appeals the district court’s orders denying his mo *207 tions filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap-pealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Watson, Nos. CR-97-262; CA-01-2115-8-20 (D.S.C. Apr. 27, 2001; filed June 14, 2001, entered June 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.