UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7128

ROGER OSBORN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOSEPH P. SACCHET, Warden; MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES; INCORPORATED CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES; LLOYD WATERS, Warden; ANTHONY SWETZ, Health Services, DPSCS; JOHN D. STAFFORD, Doctor, Medical Director, CMS; ALAN GRAVES, Doctor, DDS; HARRY HEISE, Doctor, DDS; DOCTOR MOUBAREK, Physician, CMS; ELEANOR BOWLES, Ms., Regional Health Care Administrator; ROBERT H. MILLER, Mr., Case Management Supervisor, Retired; OLIN BRAKE, Mr., Case Management Supervisor, MCI-H,

Defendants - Appellees, and

ROBERT TESTONI, Doctor, DDS,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-00- 1952-MJG)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roger Osborn, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Michael Joseph Lentz, KRAMON & GRAHAM, Baltimore, Maryland; Robert Fulton Dashiell, WARTZMAN, OMANSKY, BILBAUM, SIMONS, STEINBERG, SACHS & SAGAL, Towson, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Roger Osborn appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his

(West Supp. 2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Osborn v. Sacchet, No. CA-00-1952-MJG (D. Md.

June 15, 2001). We deny Osborn’s motion titled “Request for Time

Extension.” We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2