UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7152

JOHN HENRY JOHNSON, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

JOSEPH M. BROOKS, B.O.P., Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-01-292-3)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Henry Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: John Henry Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. Johnson v. Brooks, No. CA-01-292-3 (E.D. Va. July 3, 2001).* We grant the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The claim under Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), lacks merit because Johnson’s 220-month sentence is less than the maximum sentence authorized under 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(b)(1)(C) (West Supp. 2001). See United States v. Promise, 255 F.3d 150, 156 (4th Cir. 2001) (en banc).