United States v. Jones

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Jones

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6648

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

FREDDIE JONES, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-79-BO, CA-00-42-5-BO)

Submitted: September 28, 2001 Decided: October 17, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freddie Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Freddie Jones, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West

Supp. 2001), and denying his motions to alter or amend, for

recusal, and for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-

ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-93-79-BO; CA-00-42-5-BO

(E.D.N.C. Oct. 12, 2000; Feb. 17, 2001; May 1 & 7, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished