U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

United States v. Jones

United States v. Jones
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 17, 2001

United States v. Jones

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6648

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

FREDDIE JONES, JR., Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-93-79-BO, CA-00-42-5-BO)

Submitted: September 28, 2001 Decided: October 17, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freddie Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Robert Edward Skiver, Assis- tant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Freddie Jones, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001), and denying his motions to alter or amend, for recusal, and for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal- ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Jones, Nos. CR-93-79-BO; CA-00-42-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 12, 2000; Feb. 17, 2001; May 1 & 7, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.