Williams v. Wade

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Williams v. Wade

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1952

NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DONALD F. WADE, Doctor; THOMAS F. ALLGOOD, JR.; JOHN D. KASSELL; JOHN R. ETHRIDGE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (CA-00-360-4-12)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Norman Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order that

construed his civil action as filed under

42 U.S.C.A. § 1983

(West

Supp. 2001) and dismissed it without prejudice. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Williams v. Wade, No. CA-00-360-4-12 (D.S.C. July 6, 2001). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished