U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Williams v. Wade

Williams v. Wade
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 15, 2001

Williams v. Wade

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-1952

NORMAN WILLIAMS, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

DONALD F. WADE, Doctor; THOMAS F. ALLGOOD, JR.; JOHN D. KASSELL; JOHN R. ETHRIDGE, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (CA-00-360-4-12)

Submitted: October 4, 2001 Decided: October 12, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Norman Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Norman Williams, Jr., appeals the district court’s order that construed his civil action as filed under 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) and dismissed it without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Wade, No. CA-00-360-4-12 (D.S.C. July 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.