United States v. Cooley
United States v. Cooley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6995
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CLAUDE V. COOLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of North Carolina, at Statesville. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-91-54-MU, CA-97-71-5-4-MU)
Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 26, 2001
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claude V. Cooley, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Claude V. Cooley appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2255(West Supp. 2001). We
have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appeal-
ability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
court. See United States v. Cooley, Nos. CR-91-54-MU; CA-97-71-5-
4-MU (W.D.N.C. May 29, 2001). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished