Smith v. Thompkins
Smith v. Thompkins
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6949
LARRY D. SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
DOCTOR THOMPKINS, Doctor of Chesterfield Jail; RONALD C. O’SHIELDS, Jail Administrator,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-01-338-2)
Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 26, 2001
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry D. Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Larry D. Smith appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 2001) complaint without preju-
dice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The district
court properly required exhaustion of administrative remedies under
42 U.S.C.A. § 1997e(a) (West Supp. 2001). Because Smith did not
demonstrate to the district court that he had exhausted admin-
istrative remedies or that such remedies were not available, the
court’s dismissal of the action, without prejudice, was not an
abuse of discretion. We therefore affirm the district court’s
order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished