Moore v. Haines
Moore v. Haines
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-6904
DONNIE MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
WILLIAM HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Correc- tional Center,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-20-2)
Submitted: October 17, 2001 Decided: October 26, 2001
Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Donnie Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Donnie Moore appeals the district court’s order denying relief
on his petition filed under
28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp.
2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s
opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the
district court’s order on the reasoning of the district court.
Moore v. Haines, No. CA-99-20-2 (N.D.W. Va. May 14, 2001).* We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The district court granted Moore’s request for a certificate of appealability.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished