Moore v. Haines

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Moore v. Haines

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6904

DONNIE MOORE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM HAINES, Warden, Huttonsville Correc- tional Center,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert Earl Maxwell, Senior District Judge. (CA-99-20-2)

Submitted: October 17, 2001 Decided: October 26, 2001

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Donnie Moore, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Donnie Moore appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his petition filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the

district court’s order on the reasoning of the district court.

Moore v. Haines, No. CA-99-20-2 (N.D.W. Va. May 14, 2001).* We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The district court granted Moore’s request for a certificate of appealability.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished