United States v. Petty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. Petty

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6779

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT W. PETTY,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 01-7079

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ROBERT W. PETTY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR- 97-107, CA-99-3672-DKC)

Submitted: October 18, 2001 Decided: October 25, 2001 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert W. Petty, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Matthew Schenning, United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; Hollis Raphael Weisman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

2 PER CURIAM:

Robert W. Petty seeks to appeal from the district court’s

orders denying his motion filed under

28 U.S.C.A. § 2255

(West

Supp. 2001), and denying his motions for discovery and for prepa-

ration of a transcript at government expense. We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and orders and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant Petty’s motion to

file an oversized application for a certificate of appealability,

we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss

the appeals on the reasoning of the district court. United States

v. Petty, Nos. CR-97-107; CA-99-3672-DKC (D. Md. filed Apr. 16,

2001 & entered May 2, 2001; June 15, 2001). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished