Stacy Lynn Arena appeals from the district court’s order denying her motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (1994). Our review of the record and the district court’s opinion discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Arena, No. CR-95-26 (E.D.Va. Apr. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.