Clark v. Queen City Recovery
Opinion
Edward Junior Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. Queen City Recovery, No. CA-00-372-3MU (W.D.N.C. May 9 & 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *163 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Edward Junior CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. QUEEN CITY RECOVERY; Carlyle Britt, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished