Clark v. Queen City Recovery

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Clark v. Queen City Recovery, 21 F. App'x 162 (4th Cir. 2001)

Clark v. Queen City Recovery

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward Junior Clark appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. Queen City Recovery, No. CA-00-372-3MU (W.D.N.C. May 9 & 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately *163 presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Edward Junior CLARK, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. QUEEN CITY RECOVERY; Carlyle Britt, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished