Ross v. Angelone
Opinion
Dennis Eugene Ross seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion * and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Ross v. Angelone, No. CA-00-349-2 (E.D.Va. Apr. 12, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
*
The parties consented to the magistrate judge's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Dennis Eugene ROSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald J. ANGELONE, Director of Virginia Department of Corrections, Defendant-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished