Kyle v. Washington
Kyle v. Washington
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7570
FREDERICK D. KYLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
ODIE WASHINGTON, Director of D.C.D.C.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Dis- trict of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-01-352-3)
Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 20, 2001
Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frederick D. Kyle, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Frederick Douglas Kyle appeals from the district’s court order
dismissing his
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 2001) complaint
without prejudice because he failed to pay the initial partial
filing fee or state that he did not have sufficient assets to pay
the fee required under
28 U.S.C.A. § 1915(b)(1) (West Supp. 2001).
Because Kyle may refile this action and pay the required fee, his
appeal is interlocutory and not subject to appellate review under
Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local 392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1066-
67 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal as frivo-
lous. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished