Hinchman v. Prime Care Medical

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Hinchman v. Prime Care Medical, 22 F. App'x 174 (4th Cir. 2001)

Hinchman v. Prime Care Medical

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jack Hinchman appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reimbursement. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hinchman v. Prime Care Medical, No. CA-01-93-1 (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jack HINCHMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, Central Regional Jail, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished