Brown v. Baskerville
Opinion
Lakeith Byron Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. ' Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Baskerville, No. CA-01-10 (E.D. Va. June 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and *172 legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Lakeith Byron BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE; G. Washington; E. Barksdale; T. Ray; S. Hill; A. Johnson; E. Graham; L. Cei; S. McNamara; R. Barlow; T. Neumayer; S v. Preutte; R. Hildebrand, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished