Brocco v. Savage
Brocco v. Savage
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-1824
JAMES M. BROCCO; OLGA BROCCO,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
versus
RICKY SAVAGE,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
ED WOODARD; COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, VIRGINIA; THE FITNESS COMPANY; HYATT CORPORATION,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-00-1685-A)
Submitted: November 19, 2001 Decided: November 28, 2001
Before WIDENER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Victor M. Glasberg, Kelly M. Baldrate, VICTOR M. GLASBERG & ASSO- CIATES, Alexandria, Virginia; Henry W. Asbill, William B. Moffitt, ASBILL, JUNKIN, MOFFITT & BOSS, CHTD., Washington, D.C., for Appellants. David J. Fudala, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
James and Olga Brocco appeal the district court’s order deny-
ing relief on their
42 U.S.C.A. § 1983(West Supp. 2001) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
of the district court. See Brocco v. Savage, No. CA-00-1685-A
(E.D. Va. May 18, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma-
terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished