William D. Longenette appeals from the district court’s March 7, 2001, order denying relief on his claims regarding his fine and incarceration and the court’s order denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We dismiss the appeal from the March 7, 2001, order for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was filed beyond the sixty-day appeal period. Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1). Regarding the district court’s order denying Longenette’s Rule 60(b) motion, we have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. * United *139 States v. Longenette, No. CR-90-136 (N.D.W.Va. July 9, 2001); United States v. Williams, 674 F.2d 310, 313 (4th Cir. 1982). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED IN PART, AFFIRMED IN PART.