James Neal, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motions for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2001) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabihty and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Neal, Nos. CR-94-27; CA-96-1624-0 (D.S.C. Apr. 27 & June 15, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.