People Of The US v. Huppenthal

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
People Of The US v. Huppenthal, 27 F. App'x 190 (4th Cir. 2001)

People Of The US v. Huppenthal

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rodney Eugene Smith appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See People of the United States v. Huppenthal, No. CA-01-239-1 (S.D.W.Va. Apr. 26, 2001). We deny Smith’s motion for immediate hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Rodney Eugene SMITH, Secured Party, Petitioner-Appellant, and People of the United States, Ex Rel; Raymond Lewis O’Fannin, Next Best Friend in the Matter Of, Petitioners, v. Mr. HUPPENTHAL, as sheriff/jailer of Southern Regional Jail; David A. Faber, Doing Business as Judge of the United States District Court, Respondents-Appellees
Status
Unpublished