Ceres Corporation v. ITO Corporation Balt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Ceres Corporation v. ITO Corporation Balt, 22 F. App'x 288 (4th Cir. 2001)

Ceres Corporation v. ITO Corporation Balt

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ceres Corporation seeks review of the Benefits Review Board’s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge’s award of longshore benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp. 2001) and holding that Ceres is the responsible employer. Our review of the record discloses that the Board’s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. See LeDuce v. Ceres Corp., No. 00—839; 00-839-A (BRB May 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
CERES CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. DARRYL LeDUCE; ITO Corporation of Baltimore; Director, Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, Respondents
Status
Unpublished