U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2001

Richardson v. F and M Bank

Richardson v. F and M Bank
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 27, 2001 · Luttig, Traxler, Gregory
22 F. App'x 310

Richardson v. F and M Bank

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Lee Richardson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Richardson’s motions to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Richardson v. F and M Bank, No. CA-01-721-2 (S.D.W.Va. Oct. 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.