Rhem v. Britain

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Rhem v. Britain, 1 F. App'x 137 (4th Cir. 2001)

Rhem v. Britain

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in their civil action. We have reviewed parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. R & M Envtl, Inc. v. Britain, No. CA-99-99-7 F (E.D.N.C. July 12, 2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Martha Scarboro RHEM, personal representative and administrator of the estate of John Rhem, Jr., R & M Environmental, Incorporated, a North Carolina Corporation John Rhem, Jr., a citizen of New Hanover County, North Carolina v. Daniel J. BRITAIN, a resident of Georgia Paragon Insurance Service, Incorporated, a Georgia corporation, and The Travelers Companies, a Connecticut corporation Citigroup Incorporated, a corporation authorized to do business in North Carolina Travelers Insurance Company
Status
Published